Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

(Redirected from Frontotemporal dementia)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Frontotemporal degeneration.png
A human brain showing frontotemporal lobar degeneration causing frontotemporal dementia.
OMIM 600274
DiseasesDB 10034
MeSH D003704

WikiDoc Resources for Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Articles

Most recent articles on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Most cited articles on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Review articles on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Articles on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Images of Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Photos of Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Podcasts & MP3s on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Videos on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Bandolier on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

TRIP on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Clinical Trials on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

NICE Guidance on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

CDC on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Books

Books on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

News

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration in the news

Be alerted to news on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

News trends on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Commentary

Blogs on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Definitions

Definitions of Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Discussion groups on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Patient Handouts on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Directions to Hospitals Treating Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Risk calculators and risk factors for Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Causes & Risk Factors for Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Diagnostic studies for Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Treatment of Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

International

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration en Espanol

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration en Francais

Business

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration in the Marketplace

Patents on Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Qasim Khurshid, M.B.B.S [1]. Kiran Singh, M.D. [2]

Synonyms and Keywords:

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTD, FTLD, Frontotemporal dementia, Pick’s disease

Overview

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is an umbrella term that refers to a group of progressive brain diseases, which are heterogeneous concerning neuropathology and etiology but share atrophy of the frontal and/or temporal cortex as a morphological feature. The clinical manifestations of the disorder depend on the primary site of atrophy and dominated by behavior alterations and language impairment. The mean survival after diagnosis is from 3 to 10 years.

Historical Perspective

Historically, patients having symptoms of frontotemporal lobe degeneration were diagnosed as Pick disease after Arnold Pick described a 71-year-old man with dementia with behavioral symptoms and sensory aphasia for the first time in 1892. This patient demonstrated severe atrophy of frontotemporal lobes on autopsy.Histopathologic examination of tissue samples showed “ballooned” achromatic neurons, which was referred to as Pick cells and argyrophilic inclusions within frontal neurons that were referred to as Pick bodies( composed of insoluble filaments of the microtubule-associated protein tau). Later on, autosomal dominant forms of Pick disease were reported, and the mutations in the gene encoding the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) located at 17q21 were identified. At present, 42 mutations in MAPT have been described in 119 families with FTLD or related disorders. However, in an estimated 60% to 70% of all patients with FTLD undergoing autopsy, no tau pathologic characteristics can be demonstrated. This autopy finding suggets that insoluble tau is not necessary for the clinical phenotype to develop..[1][2]

Classification

Frontotemporal lobe degeneration patients can be classified into three different clinical syndromes depending on the early and predominant symptoms. The overlap between these clinical syndromes can occur as the disease progresses to involve both temporal and frontal lobes more diffusely.[3]

  1. Behavioural-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD)
  1. Semantic Dementia (SD)
  2. Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia (PNFA)

Behavioural-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD)

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia is characterized by a progressive decline in executive and interpersonal skills, with altered emotions and the emergence of a variety of abnormal behaviors including disinhibition, obsessions, apathy, and stereotypes. The bvFTD can develop indolently, and early detection may depend on small changes of social circumstances, reduced libido, idiosyncratic lapses of taste or social awareness, and altered dietary or musical preferences.[4]

Semantic Dementia (SD)

Semantic dementia is also known as semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) is a highly characteristic syndrome led by the progressive breakdown of semantic memory—a type of long term memory system that stores knowledge about concepts and objects based on the individual’s accumulated experience of the world. Typically, semantic dementia initially presents with progressive loss of semantic knowledge about words, concepts and objects.[5]

Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia (PNFA)

Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia (PNFA) is characterized by a progressive breakdown in language output with slow, impaired production, effortful speech, and comprehension of grammar, and motor speech deficits. Apraxia of speech is highly characteristic of PNFA, and dysarthria is more variably present. Some patients have expressive agrammatism with terse telegraphic phrases as the dominant feature of the disease, whereas, in others, the syndrome is dominated by speech sound (phonemic) or articulatory (phonetic, speech apraxic) errors.[6]

Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) Overlap Syndromes

The frontotemporal degeneration spectrum overlaps with the syndromes of corticobasal degeneration(CBD), progressive supranuclear palsy(PSP), and FTD with motor neuron disease. CBD patients present with dystonia, limb apraxia, postural instability, Axial, and limb rigidity, myoclonus, supranuclear gaze palsies, the ‘alien limb phenomenon,’ and cortical sensory loss. The progressive supranuclear palsy syndrome(PSP) is characterized by impairment of vertical gaze, frontal behavioral changes with marked cognitive slowing, and early postural instability with falls.[7][8]

Pathophysiology

FTLD is strongly familial, with up to 40% of patients having a history of a similar disorder within their family, indicating that genetic factors play a significant role in its etiology. An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance is documented in about 10%. Three significant causal genes have been identified. Mutations in MAPT on chromosome 17 (71,160), not unexpectedly, drive FTLD-tau pathology. FTLD-TDP pathology, by contrast, is not, or perhaps only rarely, associated with mutations in the TDP-43 gene, TARDBP. Instead, it is represented by mutations in the progranulin gene (GRN) on chromosome 17 (9,34) or expansions in C9orf72 on chromosome 9 (40,134). Mutations in other genes have also, less commonly, been associated with FTLD. Of these, most notable are CHMP2B mutations on chromosome 3 (20,56,148) occurring almost exclusively within a single pedigree within the Jutland region of Denmark (20,56,74). NCI is present in such cases, and although these are ubiquitinated, the target protein remains to be identified. The classification, FTLD-UPS, has been applied in recognition of the involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the disease. The vast majority of cases with FTLD-FUS pathology appear to be sporadic. Other rare genetic forms of FTLD involve mutations in valosin containing protein (VCP) (174), SQSTMI (also known as p62), optineurin (OPTN) (104), ubiquitin 2 (UBQLN2) and TANK binding-kinase 1 (TBK1. Although collectively, such cases are numerically few, they do provide essential clues to pathogenesis since all involve TDP-43 proteinopathy, and all have functioned within the cell’s protein degradation systems. [9][10]

Causes

FTD patients have an abnormal buildup of altered brain proteins in the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain, the tau protein, and the transactive response DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43) are commonly involved. The specific functions of these proteins are not entirely known, but these proteins are critical for the proper function of neurons. In patients with FTD, these proteins are misfolded, clumped, or aggregate together, leading to atrophy of frontal and temporal lobes.

  • Almost 60% of patients have sporadic or non familial form of disease
  • Almost 40% of patients have family history of neurodegenerative disorder
  • Almost 10-25% of patients following major gene mutations have been identified.
    • MAPT
    • GRN
    • C9ORF72
  • Following gene mutations are rare causes of FTD.
    • VCP
    • TARDBP,
    • FUS
    • CHMP2B
    • TBK1

Differential Diagnosis

  • Other neurocognitive disorders
  • Other neurological conditions
  • Other mental disorders and medical conditions
Cause of dementia Clinical features Associated features Nature of progression Histopathological findings
Cognitive impairment
Recall Recollection Cue requirement for recall Infirngement of thoughts Semantic memory Procedural memory Working memory Awareness Attention Executive functioning issues Visuo-spatial skills
Alzheimer's disease +++

(Slow cognitive and functional decline with early loss of awareness)

+++ Not helpful +++ ++ - ++ +++ ++ ++ ++ Has the following clinical stages:
Lewy body dementia ++ - Helpful +++ + + +++ + +++ +++ +++
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration +/- - Helpful +++ + - +++ +++ ++ +++ -
  • Onset in young age
Vascular dementia + (Dysexecutive syndrome) - Helpful + + + ++ - ++ +++ +


Epidemiology and Demographics

The prevalence of FTD in population-based studies varied from 2.7/100,00 to 9.4 /100,000 in the 60-69-year-old group in the Zuid-Holland district, Netherlands. Two studies reported a similar incidence of FLD in adults with early-onset dementia in Cambridge, UK( 3.5/100,000 person-years in 45-64 years old group), and Rochester, USA( 3.3/100,000 person-years in 50-59 age group).[28][29]

The majority of the patients manifest the disease in the sixth decade of life, but the age of onset can vary widely from the third to the ninth decade. Although FTLD is generally considered presenile dementia, individuals over the age of 65 years account for almost 20–25% of all cases.

Risk Factors

Screening

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for FTLD.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

The clinical course of FTLD syndromes is steadily progressive, with declining function in everyday life, and patients are dependent for activities of daily living. With time they have cognitive, social, and neurological disabilities leading to complete dependency requiring institutional care. Based on a meta-analysis, the survival duration is highly variable among the FTD syndromes. The FTD associated with motor neuron disease is most aggressive and leads to death within three to five years of symptoms onset. However, patients with semantic dementia can survive for over a decade. There tends to be a convergence of syndromes with time, and the precise clinical trajectory is difficult to predict in individual cases. Wandering and intrusive behaviors, incontinence, apathy dysphagia, and mutism are common issues toward the end of life, and important sources of caregiver distress. Compared with other neurodegenerative diseases, caregivers of patients with FTD suffer from more burden.[30][31][32]

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

There is no single gold standard test to diagnose frontotemporal degeneration. The diagnosis of this disorder generally involves the following.

History and Symptoms

Behavioral variant FTD is the most common clinical subtype and comprise approximately half of all cases of FTD. The main clinical feature of bvFTD is a progressive change in personality and behavior. The following are the first behavioral changes in bvFTD.

Most patients of FTLD lack insight into their behavioral changes and the distress experienced by family members.

Physical Examination

  • Patients with initial stages of disease generally lack cranial nerve, cerebellar, sensory, pyramidal, and extrapyramidal motor findings.
  • Front release signs may be seen, but these findings are not specific to this disease.
  • Parkinsonism may also emerge in advanced stages of the disease. and patients may have following physical findings.
  • Almost 10-15 % of patients with bvFTD may develop concomitant motor neuron disease.

Laboratory Findings

Following tests may be done to exclude other causes that can mimic the FTD.

Electrocardiogram

There are no ECG findings associated with FTLD.

X-ray

There are no X ray findings associated with FTD.

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

There are no echocardiography/ultrasound findings associated with FTLD.

Neuroimaging with CT and MRI

Routine brain imaging with MRI or computed tomography (CT) is used to rule out other diseases mimicking FTD and usually remarkable only for cerebral atrophy. Some patients may show variable regional atrophy depending on the genetic and clinical phenotype.

In the majority of the patients, the following dominant patterns of regional loss are demonstrated.

Other Imaging Findings

A fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan or SPECT (single photon emission CT) can help to differentiate between FTD and Alzheimer's disease. FDG-PET scans show functional changes in glucose metabolism of the brain and are often positive earlier than MRI. SPECT reflects blood flow more than metabolic change; therefore, it is less sensitive to diagnose FTD. The FDA has approved three different versions of a PET tracer for amyloid – currently valuable to FTD diagnosis as a negative scan ruling out Alzheimer’s disease.[33]

Other Diagnostic Studies

Electrophysiologic testing is sometimes used to rule out nonspecific seizures in patients with FTD.

Diagnostic criteria for bvFTD

The International Behavioral Variant FTD Criteria Consortium (FTDC) published new criteria for bvFTD in 2011. The FTDC criteria synthesize clinical features, neuroimaging, neuropathology, and genetic testing . The FTDC criteria are structured as a diagnostic hierarchy. A diagnosis of possible bvFTD is based solely on the clinical syndrome and aims to identify patients at the mildest stages of the disease.

Possible bvFTD requires a combination of three of six clinical features:

Disinhibition

Apathy/inertia

●Loss of sympathy/empathy

●Perseverative/compulsive behaviors

●Hyperorality

●Dysexecutive neuropsychologic profile

Probable FTD requires the same clinical criteria, plus demonstrable functional decline and imaging findings that reflect the principal anatomic location of neurodegeneration in bvFTD (i.e., frontal and/or temporal lobe atrophy, hypometabolism, or hypoperfusion).

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Non Pharmacological Intervention

First-line therapy for behavioral disturbances in FTLD should be nonpharmacological. The current drug therapies are modestly effective and have serious adverse effects. A management plan that does not include a nonpharmacological intervention will not be successful. The main goals of nonpharmacological treatment include family and caregiver education, behavioral, and physical interventions to minimize the occurrence and consequences of undesired behaviors. Additional helpful interventions include physical and speech therapy, home safety evaluations, and the implementation of augmentative communication devices. A frank discussion about end-of-life decisions and goals of care is imperative.[34]

Behavioural and Cognitive Symptoms

There is no cure for FTLD, and current pharmacotherapy focuses primarily on symptomatic, neurotransmitter base treatments. There is no drug developed for these patients, and the rationale for the use of medications is their efficacy in treating similar neurodegenerative disorders. Most of the FLTD treatments reported in the literature are based on single case reports or small series.

Drugs affecting the serotonin level have the most robust rationale since there is strong evidence of serotonin deficiency in these patients. Patients with FTD have alterations of serotonin metabolites in CSF and significant neural loss in the serotonergic dorsal raphe nuclei. Many behavioral symptoms of FTLD, such as depression, disinhibition, compulsions, stereotypical movements, repetitive behaviors, and dysregulated eating, respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).[35][36]

FLD patients with severe behavioral disturbances (agitation, psychosis) should be treated with atypical antipsychotic medications. This class of medications should be used with great caution, mainly due to two reasons. First, antipsychotic medications are associated with increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia, and secondly, these patients are susceptible to extrapyramidal side effects. Increased mortality appears to be related to infections and an increase in cardiovascular events. Furthermore, these medications may also reflect a nonspecific effect of sedation in this vulnerable population. Often, atypical antipsychotics are necessary only as a temporizing measure and can be tapered as patients become more apathetic as the disease progresses.

Patients with parkinsonism should be treated with a trail of levodopa/carbidopa. However the response to these medications is inadequate in CBD and PSP. Patients not responding to levodopa should receive dopamine agonists such as pramipexole or ropinirole.

Urinary incontinence is common in FLD patients and may occur due to multiple mechanisms. For optimal treatment of bladder dysfunction, these patients should be referred for urodynamic studies to determine the underlying cause. Upper motor neuron dysfunction can be treated with anticholinergic drugs. However, anticholinergic drugs should be used with caution as they can exacerbate the cognitive and neuropsychiatric deficits. When necessary, trospium chloride or darifenacin are preferred medications due to lower CNS penetration. Intermittent catheterization should be considered for patients with lower motor neuron dysfunction. Constipation is common in these patients and responds in most cases to a daily bowel regimen.[37][38]

Surgery

Surgery is not recommended for FLD patinets.

Primary prevention

There are no established measures for the primary prevention of FTLD.

Secondary Prevention

There are no established measures for the secondary prevention of FTLD.

References

  1. Pick A. Uber die Beziehungen der senilen Hirnatrophie zur Aphasie. Prag Med Wochenschr. 1892;17:165-7.
  2. Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5'-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature. 1998;393(6686):702-705. doi:10.1038/31508
  3. Rabinovici GD, Miller BL. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs. 2010;24(5):375-398. doi:10.2165/11533100-000000000-00000
  4. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J, Van Swieten JC, Seelaar H, Dopper EG, Onyike CU, Hillis AE. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011 Sep 1;134(9):2456-77.
  5. Hodges JR, Patterson K. Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(11):1004-1014. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70266-1
  6. Rohrer JD, Rossor MN, Warren JD. Syndromes of nonfluent primary progressive aphasia: a clinical and neurolinguistic analysis. Neurology. 2010 Aug 17;75(7):603-10.
  7. Litvan I, Bhatia KP, Burn DJ, et al. Movement Disorders Society Scientific Issues Committee report: SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinsonian disorders. Mov Disord. 2003;18(5):467-486. doi:10.1002/mds.10459
  8. Kertesz A, McMonagle P. Behavior and cognition in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2010 Feb 15;289(1-2):138-43.
  9. Holm IE, Englund E, Mackenzie IR, Johannsen P, Isaacs AM. A reassessment of the neuropathology of frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 3. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66(10):884-891. doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e3181567f02
  10. Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J, et al. The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009;73(18):1451-1456. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bf997a
  11. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association. 2013. ISBN 0890425558.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. Jellinger KA (2008). "The pathology of "vascular dementia": a critical update". J. Alzheimers Dis. 14 (1): 107–23. PMID 18525132.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Murayama S (2008). "[Neuropathology of frontotemporal dementia]". Rinsho Shinkeigaku (in Japanese). 48 (11): 998. PMID 19198143.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  14. Hodges JR, Patterson K (1996). "Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: a comparative neuropsychological study". J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2 (6): 511–24. PMID 9375155.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  15. Hodges JR, Patterson K, Oxbury S, Funnell E (1992). "Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy". Brain. 115 ( Pt 6): 1783–806. PMID 1486461.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  16. "Dementia, Globalization and Contemporary Art".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. Helkala EL, Laulumaa V, Soininen H, Riekkinen PJ (1988). "Recall and recognition memory in patients with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases". Ann. Neurol. 24 (2): 214–7. doi:10.1002/ana.410240207. PMID 3178177.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. Weintraub S, Wicklund AH, Salmon DP (2012). "The neuropsychological profile of Alzheimer disease". Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2 (4): a006171. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006171. PMC 3312395. PMID 22474609.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. Goldman JG, Williams-Gray C, Barker RA, Duda JE, Galvin JE (2014). "The spectrum of cognitive impairment in Lewy body diseases". Mov. Disord. 29 (5): 608–21. doi:10.1002/mds.25866. PMC 4126402. PMID 24757110.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. Metzler-Baddeley C (2007). "A review of cognitive impairments in dementia with Lewy bodies relative to Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease with dementia". Cortex. 43 (5): 583–600. PMID 17715794.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. Uversky VN (2008). "Alpha-synuclein misfolding and neurodegenerative diseases". Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 9 (5): 507–40. PMID 18855701.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Arnold SE (2004). "Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function". Arch. Neurol. 61 (3): 378–84. doi:10.1001/archneur.61.3.378. PMID 15023815.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  23. Brion JP (1998). "Neurofibrillary tangles and Alzheimer's disease". Eur. Neurol. 40 (3): 130–40. PMID 9748670.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Lee JS, Jung NY, Jang YK, Kim HJ, Seo SW, Lee J, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Kim BC, Park KW, Yoon SJ, Jeong JH, Kim SY, Kim SH, Kim EJ, Park KC, Knopman DS, Na DL (2017). "Prognosis of Patients with Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Who have Focal Versus Diffuse Frontal Atrophy". J Clin Neurol. 13 (3): 234–242. doi:10.3988/jcn.2017.13.3.234. PMC 5532319. PMID 28748674.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. Pao WC, Dickson DW, Crook JE, Finch NA, Rademakers R, Graff-Radford NR (2011). "Hippocampal sclerosis in the elderly: genetic and pathologic findings, some mimicking Alzheimer disease clinically". Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 25 (4): 364–8. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e31820f8f50. PMC 3107353. PMID 21346515.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Tsolaki M, Kokarida K, Iakovidou V, Stilopoulos E, Meimaris J, Kazis A (2001). "Extrapyramidal symptoms and signs in Alzheimer's disease: prevalence and correlation with the first symptom". Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 16 (5): 268–78. doi:10.1177/153331750101600512. PMID 11603162.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. McGuinness B, Barrett SL, Craig D, Lawson J, Passmore AP (2010). "Executive functioning in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia". Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 25 (6): 562–8. doi:10.1002/gps.2375. PMID 19810010.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  28. Rosso SM, Donker Kaat L, Baks T, et al. Frontotemporal dementia in The Netherlands: patient characteristics and prevalence estimates from a population-based study. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 9):2016-2022. doi:10.1093/brain/awg204
  29. Ratnavalli E, Brayne C, Dawson K, Hodges JR. The prevalence of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2002;58(11):1615-1621. doi:10.1212/wnl.58.11.1615
  30. Brodaty H, Seeher K, Gibson L. Dementia time to death: a systematic literature review on survival time and years of life lost in people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(7):1034-1045. doi:10.1017/S1041610211002924
  31. Kertesz A, McMonagle P, Blair M, Davidson W, Munoz DG. The evolution and pathology of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2005 Sep 1;128(9):1996-2005.
  32. Seltman RE, Matthews BR. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration. CNS drugs. 2012 Oct 1;26(10):841-70.
  33. Norman L. Foster, Judith L. Heidebrink, Christopher M. et al., FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease, Brain, Volume 130, Issue 10, October 2007, Pages 2616–2635
  34. Merrilees J. A model for management of behavioral symptoms in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21(4):S64-S69. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e31815bf774
  35. Huey ED, Putnam KT, Grafman J. A systematic review of neurotransmitter deficits and treatments in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2006;66(1):17-22. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000191304.55196.4d
  36. Perry RJ, Miller BL. Behavior and treatment in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2001;56(11 Suppl 4):S46-S51. doi:10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_4.s46
  37. van Balken I, Litvan I. Current and future treatments in progressive supranuclear palsy. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2006;8(3):211-223. doi:10.1007/s11940-006-0012-z
  38. Perry RJ, Miller BL. Behavior and treatment in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2001;56(11 Suppl 4):S46-S51. doi:10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_4.s46

See also

sv:Frontallobsdemens


Template:WikiDoc Sources