Aortic dissection CT scan

Jump to: navigation, search

Aortic dissection Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Aortic dissection from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Special Scenarios

Management during Pregnancy

Case Studies

Case #1

Aortic dissection CT scan On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Aortic dissection CT scan

CDC on Aortic dissection CT scan

Aortic dissection CT scan in the news

Blogs on Aortic dissection CT scan

Directions to Hospitals Treating Aortic dissection CT scan

Risk calculators and risk factors for Aortic dissection CT scan

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Aarti Narayan, M.B.B.S [3]; Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [4] Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[5]

Overview

A CT scan can be used to diagnose aortic dissection if neither a TEE nor MRI is available in a timely fashion, or if there is a contraindication to their performance. An example would be after hours in an emergency room setting. If the results of the CT scan are non-diagnostic, then TEE or MRI should be performed to confirm the diagnosis.

CT

Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA)

  • Computed tomography angiography is a fast non-invasive test that will give an accurate three-dimensional view of the aorta. These images are produced by taking rapid thin cut slices of the chest and abdomen, and combining them in the computer to create cross-sectional slices.[1][2][3]
  • In order to delineate the aorta to the accuracy necessary to make the proper diagnosis, an iodinated contrast material is injected into a peripheral vein. Contrast is injected and the scan performed using a Bolus Tracking method. This is a type of scan timed to an injection, in order to capture the contrast as it enters the aorta.
  • The scan will then follow the contrast as it flows through the vessel.

Differentiating a True Lumen from a False Lumen

CT Examples of Aortic dissection [4]

Type A Dissection

Type B Dissection

2014 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases (DO NOT EDIT)[8]

Diagnostic Value of Computed Tomography in Aortic Dissection

Class I
"In unstabled patients with a suspicion of AAS, the following imaging modalities are recommended according to local availability and expertise:transoesophageal echocardiography; CT scan.(Level of Evidence: C)"
"In stable patients with a suspicion of AAS, the following imaging modalities are recommended (or should be considered) according to local availability and expertise:CT scan; MRI.(Level of Evidence: C)"

Follow-up Imaging study

Class I
"In case of initially negative imaging with persistence of suspicion of AAS, repetitive imaging (CT or MRI) is recommended.(Level of Evidence: C)"
"In case of uncomplicated Type B AD treated medically, repeated imaging (CT or MRI) during the first days is recommended. (Level of Evidence: C)"

2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease (DO NOT EDIT) [9]

Screening Tests (DO NOT EDIT)[9]

Class I
"1. Urgent and definitive imaging of the aorta using transesophageal echocardiogram, computed tomographic imaging, or magnetic resonance imaging is recommended to identify or exclude thoracic aortic dissection in patients at high risk for the disease by initial screening. (Level of Evidence: B)"

Determining the Presence and Measuring the Progression of Thoracic Aortic Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[9]

Class I
"1. For measurements taken by computed tomographic imaging or magnetic resonance imaging, the external diameter should be measured perpendicular to the axis of blood flow. For aortic root measurements, the widest diameter, typically at the mid-sinus level, should be used. (Level of Evidence: C)"

Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis (DO NOT EDIT) [9]

Class I
"1. The initial evaluation of Takayasu arteritis or giant cell arteritis should include thoracic aorta and branch vessel computed tomographic imaging or magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the possibility of aneurysm or occlusive disease in these vessels. (Level of Evidence: C)"

Surveillance of Thoracic Aortic Disease or Previously Repaired Patients (DO NOT EDIT)[9]

Class IIa
"1. Computed tomographic imaging or magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic aorta is reasonable after a Type A or B aortic dissection or after prophylactic repair of the aortic root/ ascending aorta. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"2. Computed tomographic imaging or magnetic resonance imaging of the aorta is reasonable at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postdissection and, if stable, annually thereafter so that any threatening enlargement can be detected in a timely fashion. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"3. When following patients with imaging, utilization of the same modality at the same institution is reasonable, so that similar images of matching anatomic segments can be compared side by side. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"4. Surveillance imaging similar to classic aortic dissection is reasonable in patients with intramural hematoma. (Level of Evidence: C)"

References

  1. Sentz, Amanda (2015). "The Role of CTA, MRA, and Sonography in Aortic Dissection". Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 31 (4): 235–240. doi:10.1177/8756479315586026. ISSN 8756-4793.
  2. Baliga, Ragavendra R.; Nienaber, Christoph A.; Bossone, Eduardo; Oh, Jae K.; Isselbacher, Eric M.; Sechtem, Udo; Fattori, Rossella; Raman, Subha V.; Eagle, Kim A. (2014). "The Role of Imaging in Aortic Dissection and Related Syndromes". JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 7 (4): 406–424. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.015. ISSN 1936-878X.
  3. DeWeert, Daniel (2018). "Computed tomography angiography-negative aortic dissection in a patient using Phencyclidine". World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 9 (2): 144. doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.02.011. ISSN 1920-8642.
  4. Radiopaedia.org
  5. Case courtesy of A.Prof Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 8886
  6. Case courtesy of Dr Craig Hacking, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 34693
  7. Case courtesy of Prof Cláudio Souza, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 13783
  8. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, Evangelista A, Falk V, Frank H, Gaemperli O, Grabenwöger M, Haverich A, Iung B, Manolis AJ, Meijboom F, Nienaber CA, Roffi M, Rousseau H, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Allmen RS, Vrints CJ (November 2014). "2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)". Eur. Heart J. 35 (41): 2873–926. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281. PMID 25173340.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA; et al. (2010). "2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine". Circulation. 121 (13): e266–369. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e. PMID 20233780. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)


Cardiology


Linked-in.jpg